To: Mercy Housing and Related
Henry Alvarez, Executive Director, San Francisco Housing Authority
San Francisco Housing Authority Commissioners
Douglas Shoemaker, Director, San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Housing
From: Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, C.L.A.E.R. Project
RE: HOPE SF Master Plan Advisory Committee in Sunnydale
DATE: 9/17/09
The C.L.A.E.R. Project has participated in the Sunnydale Master Plan Advisory Committee meetings with Mercy Housing since they began in June. C.L.A.E.R. Staff, as well as program affiliates, have been active in the process, attending bus tours and meetings. While we sincerely appreciate the efforts of the Mercy Housing and related staff, I am writing now because I feel there are continued missed opportunities for resident education and engagement in this planning process.
Oftentimes the meetings focus of the most superficial aspects of the rebuild. Attendees spend the majority of the meetings talking about parking, building types, and amenities, when frankly, we don’t even know who is going to live here. There has been no discussion of strategies to stabilize the existing at-risk population in order to ensure that they are eligible for one of the new units. We don’t know how many units will be rebuilt. We have never gotten a specific breakdown on unit types to be rebuilt. While it is most appreciated that residents have been able to weigh in on the location and number of laundry facilities, C.L.A.E.R. feels that these discussions could be, and should be, far more substantive.
Additionally, C.L.A.E.R. has consistently brought up three key issues in these meetings that have gone unaddressed, and have not been reflected on any Meeting Agendas:
1. The need for a comprehensive emergency disaster plan for Sunnydale specifically;
2. The need for a “Public Safety Committee”;
3. The need for a small theatre in the newly rebuilt “Community Room” as a way to showcase some of the amazingly talented youths and adults residing in Sunnydale public housing
These comments are always well received in the meetings, but are then never reflected in any of the subsequent presentations.
I am also concerned about the number of residents in Sunnydale who are not engaged with this insular process. The C.L.A.E.R. Project has a second center located at 170 Brookdale Avenue in the Sunnydale development. Our neighbors on this block, some residents for over 45 years, have not been reached out to by Mercy Housing and Related. Furthermore, large segments of the API population residing on Brookdale remain unengaged, including our Cambodian neighbors. C.L.A.E.R. has continually offered to help facilitate a meeting between this segment of the neighborhood and Mercy Housing, and that offer remains.
Finally, I am, perhaps, most concerned, with the growing number of consultants that have been attending the Master Plan Advisory Committee meetings. I feel this money could be better spent on developing resident leadership, resident outreach, or resident employment. The ratio of residents to consultants is truly deplorable.
The C.L.A.E.R. Project will continue to encourage, as we have historically, resident participation, but only resident participation anchored in economic development and real educational opportunities. C.L.A.E.R. continues to extend the offer of partnership to Mercy Housing, the San Francisco Housing Authority, and the Mayor’s Office of Housing as the HOPE SF planning process in Sunnydale continues.
Sincerely,
Sharen Hewitt
Executive Director
The C.L.A.E.R. Project
Friday, September 25, 2009
The C.L.A.E.R. Project Responds to SFHA Elections
TO: Henry Alvarez, Director, San Francisco Housing Authority
Kyle Pedersen, Director of Governmental Affairs, San Francisco Housing Authority
Denise Kimble, Program Specialist, San Francisco Housing Authority
Kim Brown, President, Public Housing Tenants Association
FROM: Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, C.L.A.E.R. Project
RE: San Francisco Housing Authority Resident Elections on 9/23/09
DATE: 9/21/09
Beginning as early as July, C.L.A.E.R. has expressed interest in participating in the San Francisco Housing Authority’s Resident Council elections in Sunnydale. C.L.A.E.R., an organization whose very mission is based on building resident capacity, sees the process of resident elections as crucial to the overall development of indigenous resident leadership.
C.L.A.E.R. is proud to enjoy an active partnership with the San Francisco Housing Authority- one that lends itself to authentic and real feedback. To this end, given our observations of the resident election process and outreach, we cannot add legitimacy by participating until the SFHA can do a better job in the execution of Resident Council elections. We implore the SFHA to further consider their decision to hold elections this Wednesday, and to please view the upcoming resident elections as a real opportunity for building leadership. This is an opportunity that cannot be squandered, particularly with important decisions coming up around the SFRA Schlage Lock site, and HOPE SF.
In the interest of seeing free and fair elections, the C.L.A.E.R. Project is offering the following suggestions on how the process could be improved to increase resident participation and maximize the election experience:
1. C.L.A.E.R. suggests, and would be happy to participate in, an aggressive level of outreach and education surrounding elections of resident leaders. The help of residents, and specifically longtime residents, should be enlisted by the SFHA to ensure the highest level of engagement possible. Community based organizations in the area should also be asked to outreach to their program affiliates and Board members.
2. Candidates MUST be adequately educated before the election takes place. This means ensuring they are well versed in the regulations surrounding the distribution of resident participation funding. Residents running for office should also be familiar with the City-Wide Resident Organization (CWRO), the Public Housing Tenants Association (PHTA), and the Citywide Council for Senior and Disabled (CCSD), and how their specific resident council interacts with those entities. Candidates should also be provided with a copy of the bylaws for the resident Council for which they are running. Prospective candidates should also be made aware the time commitment that should be allotted for their new post. Are they able to represent the development at various Commission meetings? Do they have the capacity to hold office hours on-site? How often can they hold public forums in the development? These are all questions that must be asked of potential leaders, as this is what their fellow residents expect of them.
3. We must use these elections as a way to spur further civic participation. In 2005 the Berkeley Housing Authority enlisted the assistance of the League of Women Voters to help oversee and facilitate the election of Residential Council officers. The League of Women voters could also be on-site during resident elections to register residents to vote in the upcoming San Francisco Municipal Election.
4. C.L.A.E.R. wants to ensure that all notices and election materials are available in multiple languages to maximize full participation of the resident body.
Today C.L.A.E.R. sent a staff member to be trained at the San Francisco Housing Authority as an election monitor in the hopes that we could contribute to the election process. Instead, this training session just further highlighted the amount of opportunities we have missed, and how much more could be garnered from this process. It is because we view this process is so injured that with all due respect, we are unable to participate at this time.
Sunnydale, as the largest development in San Francisco, and the 16th largest in the nation, must set the example for tenant leadership throughout the United States. This can only happen through collaboration with neighborhood organizations, persistent outreach within the development, and a true commitment to building the capacity of residents of public housing. Simply put, this process needs more time.
C.L.A.E.R. anticipates a response from the San Francisco Housing Authority regarding these suggestions and their implementation. We look forward to continued work with the San Francisco Housing Authority around this topic and others.
Kyle Pedersen, Director of Governmental Affairs, San Francisco Housing Authority
Denise Kimble, Program Specialist, San Francisco Housing Authority
Kim Brown, President, Public Housing Tenants Association
FROM: Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, C.L.A.E.R. Project
RE: San Francisco Housing Authority Resident Elections on 9/23/09
DATE: 9/21/09
Beginning as early as July, C.L.A.E.R. has expressed interest in participating in the San Francisco Housing Authority’s Resident Council elections in Sunnydale. C.L.A.E.R., an organization whose very mission is based on building resident capacity, sees the process of resident elections as crucial to the overall development of indigenous resident leadership.
C.L.A.E.R. is proud to enjoy an active partnership with the San Francisco Housing Authority- one that lends itself to authentic and real feedback. To this end, given our observations of the resident election process and outreach, we cannot add legitimacy by participating until the SFHA can do a better job in the execution of Resident Council elections. We implore the SFHA to further consider their decision to hold elections this Wednesday, and to please view the upcoming resident elections as a real opportunity for building leadership. This is an opportunity that cannot be squandered, particularly with important decisions coming up around the SFRA Schlage Lock site, and HOPE SF.
In the interest of seeing free and fair elections, the C.L.A.E.R. Project is offering the following suggestions on how the process could be improved to increase resident participation and maximize the election experience:
1. C.L.A.E.R. suggests, and would be happy to participate in, an aggressive level of outreach and education surrounding elections of resident leaders. The help of residents, and specifically longtime residents, should be enlisted by the SFHA to ensure the highest level of engagement possible. Community based organizations in the area should also be asked to outreach to their program affiliates and Board members.
2. Candidates MUST be adequately educated before the election takes place. This means ensuring they are well versed in the regulations surrounding the distribution of resident participation funding. Residents running for office should also be familiar with the City-Wide Resident Organization (CWRO), the Public Housing Tenants Association (PHTA), and the Citywide Council for Senior and Disabled (CCSD), and how their specific resident council interacts with those entities. Candidates should also be provided with a copy of the bylaws for the resident Council for which they are running. Prospective candidates should also be made aware the time commitment that should be allotted for their new post. Are they able to represent the development at various Commission meetings? Do they have the capacity to hold office hours on-site? How often can they hold public forums in the development? These are all questions that must be asked of potential leaders, as this is what their fellow residents expect of them.
3. We must use these elections as a way to spur further civic participation. In 2005 the Berkeley Housing Authority enlisted the assistance of the League of Women Voters to help oversee and facilitate the election of Residential Council officers. The League of Women voters could also be on-site during resident elections to register residents to vote in the upcoming San Francisco Municipal Election.
4. C.L.A.E.R. wants to ensure that all notices and election materials are available in multiple languages to maximize full participation of the resident body.
Today C.L.A.E.R. sent a staff member to be trained at the San Francisco Housing Authority as an election monitor in the hopes that we could contribute to the election process. Instead, this training session just further highlighted the amount of opportunities we have missed, and how much more could be garnered from this process. It is because we view this process is so injured that with all due respect, we are unable to participate at this time.
Sunnydale, as the largest development in San Francisco, and the 16th largest in the nation, must set the example for tenant leadership throughout the United States. This can only happen through collaboration with neighborhood organizations, persistent outreach within the development, and a true commitment to building the capacity of residents of public housing. Simply put, this process needs more time.
C.L.A.E.R. anticipates a response from the San Francisco Housing Authority regarding these suggestions and their implementation. We look forward to continued work with the San Francisco Housing Authority around this topic and others.
The C.L.A.E.R. Project Responds to Slow EMS Response Times to the Southeast Sector
The C.L.A.E.R. Project
1099 Sunnydale Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94134
www.claerproject.org
www.theclaerproject.blogspot.com
TWITTER: TheCLAERProject
**Media Advisory**
9/25/09
Contacts:
Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, 415-724-4797
Laurel Moeslein 415-694-8355
Yesterday the San Francisco Examiner reported that of the 10 Fire/EMS zones in San Francisco, Zone 9, which encompasses the majority of San Francisco’s Southeast sector, has the slowest response time.
The C.L.A.E.R. Project salutes and continually commends the diligent and heroic work of San Francisco’s firefighter’s and emergency medical staff, who act as first-line respondents for the sick, wounded, and terrified. However, when response times lag we must remember that the victim is not the only one who suffers. If an individual is shot and the ambulance is slow to respond, the neighborhood is victim to this image, and children suffer from PTSD and trauma for years to come. Many of the children living in San Francisco’s Southeast sector have attended far more funerals that graduations, and death is far too commonplace in our neighborhoods. Slow response4 times mean not only more lives are loss, but the culture of death and destruction is more likely to saturate our already vulnerable communities.
Response times in vulnerable neighborhoods should be comparable to those of District 2. Parity is not just something we should hope for- but something that should be absolutely guaranteed.
1099 Sunnydale Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94134
www.claerproject.org
www.theclaerproject.blogspot.com
TWITTER: TheCLAERProject
**Media Advisory**
9/25/09
Contacts:
Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, 415-724-4797
Laurel Moeslein 415-694-8355
Yesterday the San Francisco Examiner reported that of the 10 Fire/EMS zones in San Francisco, Zone 9, which encompasses the majority of San Francisco’s Southeast sector, has the slowest response time.
The C.L.A.E.R. Project salutes and continually commends the diligent and heroic work of San Francisco’s firefighter’s and emergency medical staff, who act as first-line respondents for the sick, wounded, and terrified. However, when response times lag we must remember that the victim is not the only one who suffers. If an individual is shot and the ambulance is slow to respond, the neighborhood is victim to this image, and children suffer from PTSD and trauma for years to come. Many of the children living in San Francisco’s Southeast sector have attended far more funerals that graduations, and death is far too commonplace in our neighborhoods. Slow response4 times mean not only more lives are loss, but the culture of death and destruction is more likely to saturate our already vulnerable communities.
Response times in vulnerable neighborhoods should be comparable to those of District 2. Parity is not just something we should hope for- but something that should be absolutely guaranteed.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
C.L.A.E.R. Addresses Excessive Police Activity in Visitacion Valley
MEMORANDUM
TO: George Gascon, Chief, San Francisco Police Department
San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, C.L.A.E.R Project
RE: Excessive Violence and Police Presence in Visitacion Valley with a Lack of
Matching Mental Health Resources
DATE: September 17, 2009
Last spring, the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) made several recommendations for the San Francisco Police Department’s Ingleside Police District. As a result, in April 2009, the Ingleside District entered into Phase 1 Station Implementation of the PERF recommendations, and police activity district increased dramatically.
On 9/17/09 Visitacion Valley residents experienced a number of alarming incidents that need immediate attention from all local agencies, departments, and elected officials. Twice on 9/17/09, following gunshots, the area was effectively shut down by police cars and officers converging in the center of the neighborhood- from the corner of Sunnydale Ave. and Hahn St. to the corner of Sunnydale Ave. and Rey St. The problem is not that the officers were present, because they were responding with the sense of urgency that was appropriate for the situation. The problem was that the neighborhood came under siege with police activity at approximately 3:30pm, while children are getting off the bus from school, and again 6:00pm, when children are getting picked up from various childcare centers, or one of the two Boys and Girls Clubs in the area. As a result of these inopportune times, children and their parents witnessed not one, but two violent situations today. The residual impact of this violence on the children is yet to be determined or even acknowledged, as no mental health resources were directed to the scene during or after either incident.
As this letter is being written, senior citizens living in Britton Courts and Heritage Homes are in desperate need of mental health resources following today’s events. Several seniors that C.L.A.E.R. staff spoke with were scared to leave their homes because of all the police activity and escalating violence. The numerous Latino families living in this area of the neighborhood also expressed a deep need for resources, as the language barrier prevented many of them from understanding the situation happening on the other side of their window. Additionally, several of the families leaving the Sunnydale Avenue Boys and girls Club were visibility shaken.
Additionally, it should be noted that when called C.L.A.E.R. called the Department of Public Health and Mobile Crisis for emergency mental health services for residents, we were denied a promise for mental health workers on the scene due to lack of staff and resources following recent budget cuts. Mobile Crisis put a certain resident we identified on their response list for the night, but only after C.L.A.E.R. had been on the scene acting as the trigger. Until that point there had been no coordinated strategy between mental health resources and the police.
While C.L.A.E.R. understands the serious nature of apprehending someone with a weapon, we have to have find a better way of taking someone into custody that doesn’t involve officers with AK-47’s greeting children stepping off the bus. For the past eight years C.L.A.E.R. has asked for a strategy that is mindful of providing support for people being doubly victimized on crime scenes in violent neighborhoods, specifically children, seniors, and language minorities. When gunshots ring out as our children step off the bus, and residents cower in their apartments as officers stand outside with AK-47s, we must collectively come together as advocates in this glorious city and ask ourselves “what can be done?” How can we support the police while still supporting the mother’s helping their children with math homework amidst blaring sirens?
Early on in this administration, the previous Police Chief was asked to make mental health resources available immediately on the scene of any large crime scene. We ask the same of the new Police Chief, George Gascon. This type of intervention early on in an investigation makes people feel safe and more inclined to participate. C.L.A.E.R. wants to mitigate tension between the police and the community, and level the playing field so the police are able to do their job while not inadvertently estranging themselves from a community they are attempting to protect and serve.
TO: George Gascon, Chief, San Francisco Police Department
San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sharen Hewitt, Executive Director, C.L.A.E.R Project
RE: Excessive Violence and Police Presence in Visitacion Valley with a Lack of
Matching Mental Health Resources
DATE: September 17, 2009
Last spring, the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) made several recommendations for the San Francisco Police Department’s Ingleside Police District. As a result, in April 2009, the Ingleside District entered into Phase 1 Station Implementation of the PERF recommendations, and police activity district increased dramatically.
On 9/17/09 Visitacion Valley residents experienced a number of alarming incidents that need immediate attention from all local agencies, departments, and elected officials. Twice on 9/17/09, following gunshots, the area was effectively shut down by police cars and officers converging in the center of the neighborhood- from the corner of Sunnydale Ave. and Hahn St. to the corner of Sunnydale Ave. and Rey St. The problem is not that the officers were present, because they were responding with the sense of urgency that was appropriate for the situation. The problem was that the neighborhood came under siege with police activity at approximately 3:30pm, while children are getting off the bus from school, and again 6:00pm, when children are getting picked up from various childcare centers, or one of the two Boys and Girls Clubs in the area. As a result of these inopportune times, children and their parents witnessed not one, but two violent situations today. The residual impact of this violence on the children is yet to be determined or even acknowledged, as no mental health resources were directed to the scene during or after either incident.
As this letter is being written, senior citizens living in Britton Courts and Heritage Homes are in desperate need of mental health resources following today’s events. Several seniors that C.L.A.E.R. staff spoke with were scared to leave their homes because of all the police activity and escalating violence. The numerous Latino families living in this area of the neighborhood also expressed a deep need for resources, as the language barrier prevented many of them from understanding the situation happening on the other side of their window. Additionally, several of the families leaving the Sunnydale Avenue Boys and girls Club were visibility shaken.
Additionally, it should be noted that when called C.L.A.E.R. called the Department of Public Health and Mobile Crisis for emergency mental health services for residents, we were denied a promise for mental health workers on the scene due to lack of staff and resources following recent budget cuts. Mobile Crisis put a certain resident we identified on their response list for the night, but only after C.L.A.E.R. had been on the scene acting as the trigger. Until that point there had been no coordinated strategy between mental health resources and the police.
While C.L.A.E.R. understands the serious nature of apprehending someone with a weapon, we have to have find a better way of taking someone into custody that doesn’t involve officers with AK-47’s greeting children stepping off the bus. For the past eight years C.L.A.E.R. has asked for a strategy that is mindful of providing support for people being doubly victimized on crime scenes in violent neighborhoods, specifically children, seniors, and language minorities. When gunshots ring out as our children step off the bus, and residents cower in their apartments as officers stand outside with AK-47s, we must collectively come together as advocates in this glorious city and ask ourselves “what can be done?” How can we support the police while still supporting the mother’s helping their children with math homework amidst blaring sirens?
Early on in this administration, the previous Police Chief was asked to make mental health resources available immediately on the scene of any large crime scene. We ask the same of the new Police Chief, George Gascon. This type of intervention early on in an investigation makes people feel safe and more inclined to participate. C.L.A.E.R. wants to mitigate tension between the police and the community, and level the playing field so the police are able to do their job while not inadvertently estranging themselves from a community they are attempting to protect and serve.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Letter of Support to Governor Schwarzenegger for SB 585 (LENO)
The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger
Member of the California State Government
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160
The C.L.A.E.R. Project
Executive Director Sharen Hewitt
1099 Sunnydale Avenue
San Francisco, CA 92134
Phone: 415-333-3017
Fax: 415.587.7481
RE: SB 585, a Bill to Ban Gun Shows at the Cow Palace
Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:
I am writing to inform you why you should sign SB 585, a bill that is on your desk waiting for your signature.
For the past eight years I have acted as the Executive Director of the Community Leadership Academy and Emergency Response Project (C.L.A.E.R.), an organization attempting to mitigate the effects of violence, and specifically gun violence, on San Francisco residents. My organization is located in the Visitacion Valley, and has offices in Sunnydale public housing, which is not only the largest public housing site in San Francisco, but also steps from the Cow Palace, where gun and ammunition shows occur throughout the year.
The dichotomy between these two sites couldn’t be more glaring. On one side of the street sits a community that has been experiencing disinvestment, poverty, and senseless violence for decades. On the other side of the street sits a building that profits from the very items that continually threaten these people’s lives. The Cow Palace, the NRA, and the CRPA would like for you to believe that the guns in Sunnydale public housing and throughout San Francisco’s Southeast sector don’t come from the Cow Palace, so the gun shows are totally benign. The C.L.A.E.R. Project would like you to know that the juxtaposition between these two sites, and the message that it sends to the more than 38% children living there, is more than reason enough to sign the legislation.
Cow Palace CEO Joe Barket has made the claim that the loss of gun shows at the Cow Palace would represent a significant revenue decrease, but this simply isn’t true. SBS 585 requires a three year phase out period for the gun shows, and also requires that the district replace those events with nonfirearm and nonammunition events to recoup revenue. C.L.A.E.R. believes that the Cow Palace can be utilized in much more positive ways and still prosper.
Having gun sales directly across the street from a neighborhood plagued by gun violence sends the message to residents that their lives are expendable. C.L.A.E.R. wants to this neighborhood to know that we think their lives have meaning, and that the State of California agrees.
Sincerely,
Sharen Hewitt
Executive Director
www.claerproject.org www.theclaerproject.blogspot.com TWITTER: The
Member of the California State Government
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160
The C.L.A.E.R. Project
Executive Director Sharen Hewitt
1099 Sunnydale Avenue
San Francisco, CA 92134
Phone: 415-333-3017
Fax: 415.587.7481
RE: SB 585, a Bill to Ban Gun Shows at the Cow Palace
Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:
I am writing to inform you why you should sign SB 585, a bill that is on your desk waiting for your signature.
For the past eight years I have acted as the Executive Director of the Community Leadership Academy and Emergency Response Project (C.L.A.E.R.), an organization attempting to mitigate the effects of violence, and specifically gun violence, on San Francisco residents. My organization is located in the Visitacion Valley, and has offices in Sunnydale public housing, which is not only the largest public housing site in San Francisco, but also steps from the Cow Palace, where gun and ammunition shows occur throughout the year.
The dichotomy between these two sites couldn’t be more glaring. On one side of the street sits a community that has been experiencing disinvestment, poverty, and senseless violence for decades. On the other side of the street sits a building that profits from the very items that continually threaten these people’s lives. The Cow Palace, the NRA, and the CRPA would like for you to believe that the guns in Sunnydale public housing and throughout San Francisco’s Southeast sector don’t come from the Cow Palace, so the gun shows are totally benign. The C.L.A.E.R. Project would like you to know that the juxtaposition between these two sites, and the message that it sends to the more than 38% children living there, is more than reason enough to sign the legislation.
Cow Palace CEO Joe Barket has made the claim that the loss of gun shows at the Cow Palace would represent a significant revenue decrease, but this simply isn’t true. SBS 585 requires a three year phase out period for the gun shows, and also requires that the district replace those events with nonfirearm and nonammunition events to recoup revenue. C.L.A.E.R. believes that the Cow Palace can be utilized in much more positive ways and still prosper.
Having gun sales directly across the street from a neighborhood plagued by gun violence sends the message to residents that their lives are expendable. C.L.A.E.R. wants to this neighborhood to know that we think their lives have meaning, and that the State of California agrees.
Sincerely,
Sharen Hewitt
Executive Director
www.claerproject.org www.theclaerproject.blogspot.com TWITTER: The
Thursday, September 3, 2009
COME TWEET FOR PEACE!
The C.L.A.E.R. Project’s 2009 Campaign for Life presents…
Tweeting for Peace*
Remembering 9/11
“Bonfire” Vigil (environmentally-friendly)
Great Hwy and Fulton St, San Francisco, CA
Friday, 7:30 pm–8:30 pm
Let’s move beyond violence, globally and locally.
Take action: “Darkness can no longer exist where there is one flicker of light”. On 9/11 join peacemakers and organizations from all over the United States for a “TweetUp for Peace.” The C.L.A.E.R. Project will be holding a small bonfire at the beach. Please come and “light a log for peace” and stand with your progressive brothers and sisters in solidarity.
This action will be mirrored in New York City, making this a historical bi-coastal moment for change. Please stop by and be a part of the movement.
For details, please call (415) 333-3017, or e-mail (laurel.claer@yahoo.com)
Sponsored by the Community Leadership Academy and Emergency Response Project (C.L.A.E.R. Project)
1099 Sunnydale Ave, San Francisco, CA 94134
Twitter: TheClaerProject www.claerproject.org theclaerproject.blogspot.com
*Tweeting is a trademark of twitter.com. No copyright infringement is intended.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)